(Source X)
According to reports, IPL franchises have expressed their desire for a larger interval between mega auctions and an increase in the number of Right-to-Match options available during auctions.
The ten teams are preparing for the upcoming mega auction slated for the next season, amidst uncertainty surrounding player retention rules. Clarity is expected to emerge following an anticipated meeting between franchise officials and IPL authorities, which may convene as early as next week, although a definitive date is yet to be set.
Prior to this gathering, franchise representatives shared their recommendations concerning auction procedures and player retention during a feedback session. One key proposal is to extend the current three-year gap between mega auctions to five years, as per ESPNcricinfo’s report.
Franchises argue that extending the gap between mega auctions to five years would bolster continuity, particularly in nurturing young, uncapped Indian players. Many franchises, especially those involved since the inaugural 2008 season, have established academies aimed at discovering talent at grassroots levels and fostering their development.
They contend that a five-year interval between mega auctions would incentivize teams to sustain these efforts, potentially fostering a more dedicated fan base. Historically, mega auctions have occurred every three years, except on two occasions: first in 2018 when Chennai Super Kings and Rajasthan Royals returned following a two-year suspension, and again in 2021 due to the pandemic-related postponement of the auction by a year.
Increased RTM options expected at IPL auction.
IPL franchises have also called for an increase in Right-to-Match (RTM) options during auctions, which would enable them to retain former players by matching the highest bid. This demand aims to provide teams with an advantage in securing key talents they have developed or previously signed.
According to the report, a CEO from one franchise suggested a potential scenario where teams could retain one marquee player outright, with the rest retained through RTMs. However, another official expressed concerns that such a policy might lead to discontent among retained players.
In an alternative proposal put forward by one franchise, there would be no direct player retention but up to eight RTM options available. This suggestion has generated mixed reactions among other franchises. While some believe it could level the playing field, others are wary of placing top players back into the auction pool.
There are also apprehensions that franchises might inflate prices for star players during auctions to disrupt competitors’ strategies. More clarity on these matters is expected following an upcoming meeting between IPL officials and franchise representatives in the coming days.
